Before you begin…

Take a moment and breathe. Place your hand over your chest area, near your heart. Breathe slowly into the area for about a minute, focusing on a sense of ease entering your mind and body. Click here to learn why we suggest this.

A few years ago I wrote an article about how millions of people tuned into the wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, when millions of people should have been tuned into Royal Family pedophilia and child sex trafficking. The idea that the Royal Family and other “elites” could be involved in such activity was once considered an conspiracy theory, but with the recent revelations of Prince Andrew, his teenaged (at the time) accusers, and his connections to the late pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, it’s not so much in the “conspiracy theory” realm anymore.

There’s a lot of media attention right now regarding Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, their children, and supposed racism in the Royal Family. This topic is and has been blowing up within the mainstream media, but we never really hear about Royal Family pedophilia within the mainstream media, which is quite odd but not surprising. A lot of information has surfaced over the years about possible Royal Family pedophila, and I thought I’d use the “virality” of Harry and Meghan right now to bring attention to it.

–>Watch a free sneak peek of our new course: Our latest course focuses on how to improve your critical thinking and become more aware of bias. Click here to check it out!

The accusations of child trafficking and sexual abuse that surround the Royal Family are, if you look into it, quite overwhelming. It’s similar to the accusations and evidence that has come out of the Vatican, yet these institutions are and have been viewed and portrayed as ‘God-Like’ in the eyes of the masses. These are incredibly powerful people, and there’s no telling how much influence they have on the world of media, information, finances, and on organizations that seem to be the dictators and deciders of which direction the human race will go and what measures will be implemented to get there. The World Economic Forum and their “Great Reset” is a great example, which is also sponsored by the Royal Family. There’s no doubt they sit somewhere within the upper levels of the pyramid it seems, at least in my opinion.

Accusations

Again, accusations and investigations of Royal Family pedophilia are very long. This article doesn’t even touch the tip of the iceberg but does provide a bit of a background and some leads if you’re interested in furthering your research. For example, a member of the Royal family was claimed to be part of a suspected paedophile ring under investigation by police in the late 1980s, a former Metropolitan Police officer said he was told by a detective sergeant that the investigation into the ring, which was also claimed to include an MP, was shut down for “national security reasons.”

Today, national security has become an umbrella term to keep secrets and protect people, corporations and governments who participate in immoral and unethical actions. Exposure of these actions is a big threat to the “establishment”, which is why people like Julian Assange are in jail, for example, and Edward Snowden is living in exile.

Peter McKelvie, a former child protection chief in the UK, gained attention when he claimed that senior politicians, military figures and even people linked to the Royal Family were among alleged child sexual abusers. While working in Hereford and Worcester, he helped to convict notorious child abuser Peter Righton, who was once one of the country’s most respected authorities on child care.  This highlights a great point, and something that I’ve come across multiple times in my research. Many people who work for national child care protection programs are directly involved in this type of thing. McKelvie  is one of many who told the world that these types of powerful VIP pedophile rings have been running in secrecy for multiple years. (source)

Below is a picture of Prince Charles, pictured with his close friend, well known pedophile Jimmy Savile.

In his book “The Mountbattens: Their Lives & Loves,” biographer Andrew Lownie notes that in a 1944 FBI file, Elizabeth de la Poer Beresford, Baroness Decies, said: “that in these circles, Lord Louis Mountbatten and his wife are considered persons of extremely low morals.”

She stated that Lord Louis Mountbatten was known to have a perversion for young boys. In Lady Decies’ opinion he is an unfit man to direct any sort of military operations because of this condition. She stated further that his wife Lady Mountbatten was considered equally erratic.

Further, Lownie interviewed two men who both said they were raped by Mountbatten. One was a resident at the notorious Kincora Boys Home in Belfast, which was later found to be the center of a pedophilia ring for powerful men, while the other claimed to have met Mountbatten at Classiebawn Castle, his residence in Co Sligo, a number of times in the summer he was killed.

The Guardian describes:

A number of Kincora abuse victims have tried through the courts to force the scandal to be included in the national investigation into allegations of establishment paedophile rings operating in Westminster.

Gary Hoy tried and failed last month to force the home secretary to include Kincora in the Westminster inquiry. Hoy and others fear that the Kincora inquiry, which is based in Northern Ireland and taking hearings at the court in Banbridge, County Down, will not have access to sensitive MI5 intelligence files on the people who ran Kincora.

Amnesty International has described the Kincora scandal as one of the most disturbing to emerge from the Ulster Troubles.

Patrick Corrigan, Amnesty’s director in Northern Ireland, said: “Nothing less than a full public inquiry – with all the powers of compulsion which that brings – can finally reveal what happened and the role that the security services may have played in the abuse of these vulnerable boys.”

In the UK, alleged culprits have included celebrities, the social services and police (whose systemic failures resulted in an estimated 1,400 children being sexually exploited in the town of Rotherham between 1997 and 2013), politicians (the evidence of a pedophile ring operating within the corridors of Westminster during the 1980s is now seems “incontrovertible after London´s Metropolitan Police described allegations from an anonymous survivor as “credible and true”, and even employees of the Royal Family, as well as members of the Royal Family.

Below is an image of Jeffrey Epstein, Harvey Weinstein & Ghislaine Maxwell pictured together at Prince Beatrice’s 18th birthday party. Beatrice is the daughter of Prince Andrew.

This kind of thing has happened stateside as well, research eventually led to the Franklin scandal that broke in 1989 when hundreds of children were apparently flown around the US to be abused by high ranking ‘Establishment’ members. Former state senator John W DeCamp, cited as one of the most effective legislators in Nebraska history, was the  attorney for two of the abuse victims. A 15 year old girl disclosed that she had been abused since the age of 9 and was exposed since the age of 9 and was exposed to ‘ritual murder’ of a new born girl, a small boy (who was subsequently fried and eaten) and three others. (source)

Mohamed Al-Fayed, father of Dodi Fayed, the boyfriend of Princess Diana at the time of her death stated that Princess Diana had tapes of”serious sexual offenses” going on inside Buckingham Palace. (source)

It’s not just UK royals, but royals across Europe have been implemented in this type of activity. In 2004 a Belgium paedophile and child killer Marc Dutroux was sentenced to life in prison for the abduction and rape of six girls – aged between eight and 19 – in 1995 and 1996, and the deaths of two of them, who he buried alive.  A book published by two French journalists regarding Marc Dutroux (mentioned above) implicated King Albert II within these pedophile rings as well. The Royal Family actually took the journalists to court. (source)

Residential school survivor by the name of William Coombes was set to testify at a session of the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State against humanity committed by Elizabeth II and her husband but suddenly had a mysterious death. You can learn more about that here.

Final Thoughts

This article does not even begin to scratch the surface of this phenomenon. If you want to read about more examples, you can do so in a previous article I published here.

We have also interviewed Anneke Lucas, you can access the full 4 part interview by starting a free trial on CETV, a platform we created to help combat internet censorship and allow us to continue to do our work and get the word out about various issues and topics. Lucas was a child who was trafficked into an elite pedophile ring as a child.

At the end of the day, you don’t need someone with a letter (Q) to bring awareness to this issue. In fact, using that as a source simply ridicules it, as there are no credible sources provided and it makes it easier to label as “fake news” and a conspiracy theory. There are more than enough credible leads to see that this is actually a real issue that deserves serious attention.

At the end of the day, allegations of this type of activity in high places are quite prevalent, and accusers as well as investigations never seem to really get anywhere. These people who are accused seem to be “protected” from the law in many ways. We see it with war crimes, and in other areas that go beyond child sex trafficking and pedophilia. If you go into the historical aspect of it all, you eventually release that these establishments actually created modern day law.

There is so much evidence showing that the global financial elite (various members of big politics, corporations, Hollywood, Royal Families, and people in positions of great power, the Vatican, etc.) are engaged in this behaviour. This might surprise us, but then again, look at the world, its systems, and all aspects that surround humanity. Does it reflect leadership that wishes thrivability on humanity?

Do we really want to participate in these systems? Do we really want to look towards politics as a means to bring about change if so many who have control are not the type of people that would bring about meaningful change? Does voting perhaps uphold a system that’s truly not capable of acting in humanity’s best interests? Why do we always look towards “them” for solutions?

What is the solution to stop the particular problem discussed in this article? I don’t know, but I do know that not talking about it is not one of them, and in doing so we simply aid in this type of activity.